Lash, Inc. v. A. C. Ogden Milk Co.
City of New York Municipal Court
1Opinion of the CourtFaulkner, J.
This is an action to recover for certain merchandise sold on April 22, 1936, under the trade name of Lash’s Imitation Orangeade Fruit and Flavor Base, which the defendant refused to pay for upon the ground that there was an express warranty that the goods would be fit for the purpose intended, i. e., resale to retail trade, and they were not, because they did not comply with the provisions of the Agriculture and Markets Law.
Several other defenses have been interposed and while their consideration is unnecessary to a determination of the controversy, nevertheless, I decide:
1. That the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- International Text Book Co. v. . ToneNew York Court of Appeals · 1917
- Haynor Manufacturing Co. v. DavisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1908
- Kelvinator Sales Corp. v. Quabbin Improvement Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1931
- Churchill Grain & Seed Co. v. BuchmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1922
- Eatonton Cotton Mills, Inc. v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.New York Supreme Court · 1924
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- People v. LipoffNew York City Magistrates' Court · 1943