Legal Opinion

Texas & P. Ry. Co. v. Rampy

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided April 20, 1934No. 1259Published

1Opinion of the Court

HICKMAN, Chief Justice.

Forty-five assignments of error are briefed in this cause, hut, since we have determined that the judgment of the trial court must be reversed, we shall discuss only the questions upon which the reversal is ordered and those which will probably arise upon another trial. Our statement of the case will he based exclusively upon appel-lee’s testimony. He offered no fact witness other than himself, and, in deference to the findings of the jury, we shall regard his testimony as true and disregard all. testimony in conflict therewith.

Appellee testified that during the month…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. WelshSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
  2. Chicago & North Western Railway Co. v. BolleSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  3. Texas & P. Ry. Co. v. PerkinsTexas Commission of Appeals · 1932
  4. Standard v. Texas Pacific Coal & Oil Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1931
  5. Texas & Pacific Ry. Co. v. FosterCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1933

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API