Walding v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
The opinion states the case.
1Opinion of the Court
Krueger, Judge.
The conviction is for adultery; the punishment assessed is a fine of $100.00.
Appellant’s first contention is that the evidence is insufficient to justify and sustain his conviction under the charge in the complaint and information wherein it is averred that Wood Walding, a married man, and Kate Goodrich, a married woman, did, on or about the 10th day of August, 1937, commit adultery by then and there having habitual carnal intercourse without living together.
In order to meet the allegation in the complaint and information, it was necessary that the evidence show (1) that each…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Torres v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1929
- Buckner v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1934
- Newborn v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1927
- Hays v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1914
3Cited by7 opinions
- Paine v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1940
- Walker v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1975
- Bacon v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1944
- Adams v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1976
- McClure v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1981
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.