Legal Opinion

Ala. Midland R'way Co. v. Brown

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided November 15, 1893PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from Pike Chancery Court. Heard before the Hon. Jwo. A. FOSTER.

1Opinion of the CourtColeman, J.

The bill was filed to reform an instrument, which was intended to convey the right of way over certain lands of the respondents. The bill avers that in the deed, the lands over which the right of way passes, are described as being the N. W. \ of section 12, when it should have been the N. W. i of section 13.” It is agreed by the parties, that there was a mistake in the description of the land, and that the averment of the bill in this respect is true. The reformation of the instrument is resisted upon the ground, that respondents were damaged by the breach of a parol agreement, made at the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Gardner v. MooreSupreme Court of Alabama · 1883
  2. Bridgeport Land & Improvement Co. v. American Fire-proof Steel Car Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1891
  3. Connor v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of Alabama · 1888
  4. Parker v. ParkerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1889

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Haley v. Kansas City, Memphis & Birmingham RailroadSupreme Court of Alabama · 1896
  2. Nashville, Chattanooga & St. Louis Railway Co. v. HammondSupreme Court of Alabama · 1893
  3. Tillis v. SmithSupreme Court of Alabama · 1895
  4. Brown v. ALABAMA GREAT SOUTHERN RR CO.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  5. Harris v. IveySupreme Court of Alabama · 1896

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API