Chandler Supply Co., Inc. v. City of Boise
Idaho Supreme Court
1DissentDonaldson, Chief Justice
To countenance the construction of the discretionary function exception of I.C. § 6-904(1) adopted by the majority would be to emasculate the Idaho Tort Claims Act, Title 6, Ch. 9, I.C. To construe the discretionary function exception to apply to all planning and operational decisions in traditional governmental functions does not further the general purpose of the Act as expressed in I.C. § 6-903(a). I dissent.
Prior to the adoption of the Idaho Tort Claims Act, Title 6, Ch. 9, I.C., which was the legislative response to our decision in Smith v. State, 93 Idaho 795, 473 P.2d 937 (1970), the…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Indian Towing Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Rayonier Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Johnson v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Smith v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 1970
- State v. AbbottAlaska Supreme Court · 1972
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.