Legal Opinion

Smith v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided October 25, 1916No. 4208PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HARPER, Judge.

Appellant prosecutes this appeal from a conviction for manslaughter. While there are three bills of exception in the record, in the argument of appellant’s attorney made in open court and in the brief filed, he presents but one of them—the one complaining of the admission of the alleged dying declaration in evidence. The other two complain that the court was in error in admitting the statement of appellant’s wife and his reply, “Oh, go back to the house—I have done nothing hut kill a d—n dog.” If the remark of the wife had not been necessary to make plain the remark of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Medina v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1901
  2. Highsmith v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1899
  3. Vinson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1915
  4. Dees v. CraneCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1915
  5. Gant v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1914

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Railroad Commission v. Humble Oil & Refining Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1946
  2. Sessions v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1917
  3. Sessions v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1917

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API