Frymyer v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Benham, Judge.
Appellant was convicted of child molestation. We affirm his conviction.
1. In his first enumerated error, appellant complains that a statement he gave police should not have been admitted at trial, because it was not freely and voluntarily made. Appellant maintains his “limited intellectual capacity” rendered him incapable of freely and voluntarily waiving his constitutional rights.
At the Jackson-Denno hearing conducted prior to the admission of appellant’s statement, the questioning officer stated that appellant’s statement to authorities was given after appellant had been ad…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Berger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- De Palma v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1969
- Wilson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1978
- Caldwell v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1976
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Ely v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1989
- Harry S. Peterson Co. v. NAT. UNION FIRE INSURANCE CO.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1993
- Whittington v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1987
- Chesser v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
- Ray v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1988
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.