Legal Opinion

Garth v. Fort

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1885PublishedCited by 1 opinion

FROM ROBERTSON. Appeal from the Chancery Court at Springfield. Geo. E. Seay, Ch.

1Opinion of the Court

Tu\RtJEY> J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

In August, 1867, J. B. Fort died intestate, in Robertson county, leaving four children, viz: J.W. and J. H. Fort, Mrs. Garth and Mrs. Ligón. The children agreed to partition the lands, and on December 4, 1867, a deed interpartes to that end was prepared and purports to have been acknowledged by Mrs. Garth and Mrs. Ligón, on December 20, 1867.

Mrs. Ligón lived in Montgomery county; Mrs. 'Garth in Robertson. The other ' parties acknowledged the deed at different times.

It is claimed that on January 11, 1868, S. M. Ligón, with his wife, conveyed the…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. National Cash Register Co. v. LeachCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API