Legal Opinion

Spatz v. Kirby

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided January 23, 1998No. 96-04974PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

The appellant, Dr. Hugo Spatz, challenges the final judgment awarding damages to the appellee, Robert L. Kirby, in his action for intentional interference with a business relationship. We reverse. ■

The appellee filed an amended complaint alleging that the appellant interfered with appellee’s business relationship with Charlotte County. Appellee was employed by Charlotte County as assistant to the building director. Appellant was a “communicator” for the Concerned Citizen’s Coalition which is a citizen “watch dog” group concerned with wasteful activities in the Charlotte County government. The…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Ethan Allen, Inc. v. Georgetown ManorSupreme Court of Florida · 1994
  2. Fla. Fern Growers Ass'n v. Concerned CitizensDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993
  3. King v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996
  4. Children's Palace, Inc. v. JohnsonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Dade County Police Benevolent Ass'n v. Town of SurfsideDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API