Legal Opinion

Jemrock Realty Co. v. Anderson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 25, 1996PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

The rent reductions were imposed for service reductions, including an inoperative elevator, a defective fire door and improperly weather-sealed and non-maintained windows. The factual issues raised by petitioner were for the administrative agency to resolve, and the record reveals that the challenged determination of the agency has a rational basis and was not arbitrary and capricious (see, Matter of 230 E. 52nd St. Assocs. v State Div. of Hous. & Community Renewal, 131 AD2d 349).

We have considered petitioner’s remaining arguments and find them to be without merit. Concur—Murphy, P. J.,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. 230 East 52nd Street Associates v. State Division of Housing & Community RenewalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Jemrock Realty Co. v. RoldanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API