Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Burge v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided October 28, 1986No. BF-317Published

1Concurrence

BARFIELD, Judge,

concuring:

I concur in reversing and remanding the case on rehearing for resentencing. However, I do so not because of Mischler/Al-britton analysis but because my perception of the reason for departure expressed in separately numbered paragraphs by the trial judge may have too liberally interpreted the trial judge’s writing.

It appears that the trial judge could predicate departure on an application of the criteria set forth in section 775.084, Florida Statutes (1983). Hall v. State, 492 So.2d 692 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986). Upon reflection, that analysis should not be read into/the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Holt v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
  2. Hall v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986
  3. Dean v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API