Legal Opinion

Shaw v. Shelby County Department of Public Welfare

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided January 21, 1992No. 73A05-9108-JV-268PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STATON, Judge.

Ralph Rouse and Carol Shaw appeal the involuntary termination of the parent-child relationship between themselves and their child R.R. The parents present two (restated) issues for our review:

I. Whether clear and convincing evidence exists to support the trial court’s determination that:(a) there is a reasonable probability that the conditions which resulted in the child’s removal from the home will not be remedied;(b) the termination of the parent-child relationship is in the best interests of R.R.; and(c) the Shelby County Department of Public Welfare has a satisfactory plan…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Meyer v. NebraskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  2. Pierce v. Society of SistersSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  3. Perkins v. Allen County Department of Public WelfareIndiana Court of Appeals · 1976
  4. Matter of MiedlIndiana Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Matter of DBIndiana Court of Appeals · 1990

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. M.M. v. Elkhart Office of Family & ChildrenIndiana Court of Appeals · 2000
  2. Stone v. Daviess County Division of Children & Family ServicesIndiana Court of Appeals · 1995
  3. Tipton v. Marion County Department of Public WelfareIndiana Court of Appeals · 1994
  4. Doe v. Daviess County Division of Children & Family ServicesIndiana Court of Appeals · 1996
  5. In Re Adoption/Guardianship of Victor A.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2005

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API