Legal Opinion

Brown Manuf'g Co. v. Mast

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern Ohio

Decided December 3, 1892No. 4,230Published

In Equity. Bill Tby the Brown Manufacturing Company against P. P. Mast & Co. for infringement of letters patent Ho. 190,816, issued May 15, 1877, to William P. Brown, for a cultivator. The alleged infringing machine was made under letters patent Ho. 260,447, issued July 4, 1882, to D. Berlew and M. L. Kissel.

1Opinion of the Court

TAET, Circuit Judge.

This is a suit in equity, brought for the infringement of letters patent Ho. 390,816, granted to William P. Brown, and duly assigned to the complainant herein, the Brown Manufacturing Company. The defenses set up in the answer are want of novelty, absence of patentable invention in the patented device, and noninfringement. The patent sued on is for an improvement in the couplings of corn cultivators. These machines are for the purpose of loosening and keeping free from weeds the soil between the rows of growing com. Then general form has long been known. They consist of an…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Rumford Chemical Works v. HeckerU.S. Circuit Court for the District of New Jersey · 1876
  2. American Middlings Purifier Co. v. ChristianU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Minnesota · 1877

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API