Legal Opinion

State v. Manoff

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided January 3, 2019No. A163165PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

*567Defendant challenges the imposition of three $200 felony fines imposed as part of his sentence for his property crime convictions. Defendant points to ORS 161.645, which requires a court to consider, when imposing such fines, the financial resources of the defendant and the burden the payment of the fine will impose on the defendant.1 According to defendant, the trial court did not take into account those considerations when it announced at sentencing that it would impose the three $200 fines. Defendant acknowledges that he did not object to the imposition of the fines when the court…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. BrownOregon Supreme Court · 1990
  2. State v. WheelerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
  3. State v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. ShepherdCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2020
  2. State v. SeckCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2020
  3. State v. HansonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2020
  4. State v. WearCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API