Legal Opinion

Hasler v. Industrial Commission

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided June 17, 1983No. 56828PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Moran

Claimant, Maxine Hasler, sought workmen’s compensation for an injury she sustained while in the employ of respondent, Robert Wease. An arbitrator found that she was totally and permanently disabled, and awarded her compensation in accordance with section 10(e) of the Workmen’s Compensation Act (Act) (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1979, ch. 48, par. 138.10(e)). The Industrial Commission modified the decision of the arbitrator, finding that claimant was temporarily totally disabled. It further determined that her earnings base should be computed pursuant to section 10(a) of the Act (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1979, ch.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Vaught v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Ruda v. Industrial BoardIllinois Supreme Court · 1918
  3. K. & R. Delivery, Inc. v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1957
  4. Stellwagen v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1935
  5. Friddle v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1982

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Sylvester v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Young v. Alden Gardens of Waterford, LLCAppellate Court of Illinois · 2015
  3. Illinois-Iowa Blacktop, Inc. v. Industrial CommissionAppellate Court of Illinois · 1989
  4. Rambert v. Industrial CommissionAppellate Court of Illinois · 1985
  5. Young v. Alden Gardens of Waterford, LLCAppellate Court of Illinois · 2015

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API