Greenslitt v. Three Bros. Baking Co.
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBelt, J.
This is an action to recover damages on account of the alleged negligence of defendant Herman C. Grindeland while driving a bread delivery truck owned by defendant Three Bros. Baking Co. It is conceded that Grindeland, at the time in question, was an employee of the defendant company and was acting within the scope of his authority. From a judgment in favor of the plaintiff as administratrix of her husband’s estate, the defendants appeal.
There are only two questions involved, viz., (1) Is there any substantial evidence tending to show that Grindeland was negligent in driving the truck at a…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- State v. MillerOregon Supreme Court · 1926
- Hamilton v. FinchOregon Supreme Court · 1941
- Sorsby v. BenninghovenOregon Supreme Court · 1916
- Schairer v. JohnsonOregon Supreme Court · 1929
- Hefling v. HeintzOregon Supreme Court · 1937
3Cited by12 opinions
- Cowgill, Adm'r v. Boock, Adm'rOregon Supreme Court · 1950
- Lemons v. HollandOregon Supreme Court · 1955
- Cameron v. GoreeOregon Supreme Court · 1948
- Burghardt v. OlsonOregon Supreme Court · 1960
- White v. KELLER ET UX.Oregon Supreme Court · 1950
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.