Legal Opinion

Scott Panetti v. Lorie Davis, Director

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided July 11, 2017No. 14-70037PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PATRICK E. HIGGINBOTHAM, Circuit Judge:

Our question today is competency to be executed and its attending procedures, not the validity of the conviction or sentence. We stayed execution to consider. Scott Panetti’s appeal from the denial of appointed counsel and funding to hire a mental health expert and investigator. We will now reverse the district court’s denial of appointed counsel and expert funding under 18 U.S.C. § 3599, vacate its factual findings relating to Panetti’s competency, and remand for additional proceedings, another chapter in this judicial plunge into the dark fprest of…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Gregg v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Atkins v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  3. Roper v. SimmonsSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  4. Ford v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. McFarland v. ScottSupreme Court of the United States · 1994

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Battaglia v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2017
  2. Cheng v. HSBC Bank USA, N.A.District Court, E.D. New York · 2025
  3. Dixon v. RyanDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2022
  4. Galbraith v. HooperDistrict Court, M.D. Louisiana · 2022
  5. Mays v. DavisDistrict Court, E.D. Texas · 2020

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API