Legal Opinion
Marcus Holley v. The Seminole County School District
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Decided June 12, 1985No. 84-8077PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Per curiam
No member of this panel nor other Judge in regular active service on the Court having requested that the Court be polled on rehearing en banc (Rule 35, Fed.R.App.P.; Eleventh Circuit Rule 26), the Suggestion for Rehearing En Banc is DENIED.
The Petition for Panel Rehearing is DENIED. Appellees argue on rehearing that because appellant’s constitutional claims were rejected by the Georgia State Board of Education, the federal full faith and credit statute, 28 U.S.C.A. § 1738, precludes litigation of those claims in federal court under the Supreme Court’s analysis in Migra v. Warren City School…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Migra v. Warren City School District Board of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Kremer v. Chemical Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- McDonald v. City of West BranchSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Marcus Holley v. The Seminole County School DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1985
- Cynthia B. Gorin v. Elton S. Osborne, Jr., M.D.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1985
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Henry G. Mack v. South Bay Beer Distributors, Inc., Dba Bay Beer Distributors, a California CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- United States v. LevyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2004
- Plaine v. McCabeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Kurtz v. VickreyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1988
- Gjellum v. City of BirminghamCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1987
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.