Legal Opinion

The People v. Dunham

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided April 20, 1929No. 18696. Reversed and remandedPublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Plaintiff in error, A.E. Dunham, in the circuit court of Pike county, was found guilty upon the third count of an indictment charging him with passing a forged check knowing the same to have been forged. He was sentenced to the penitentiary and has prosecuted a writ of error to review the judgment.

The first two counts of the indictment charged the forgery of the check, and the third count charged the passing of the forged check knowing it to have been forged.

Plaintiff in error lived near New Salem, in Pike county. He owned thirteen shares of stock in the New Salem State Bank and had a…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People v. SingerIllinois Supreme Court · 1919
  2. Dacey v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1886
  3. People v. GarinesIllinois Supreme Court · 1924
  4. The People v. VammarIllinois Supreme Court · 1926

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. People v. GriffithsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1983
  2. The People v. KenzikIllinois Supreme Court · 1956
  3. People v. DavisIllinois Supreme Court · 1950
  4. Zasada v. StateNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1952
  5. People v. ParkAppellate Court of Illinois · 1980

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API