Legal Opinion

Benthall v. Seifert

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1881No. 8862PublishedCited by 10 opinions

From the Posey Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Newcomb, C.

The nature and purpose of this action are stated as follows in the brief of counsel for the appellee:

“This action was brought for a private nuisance caused by the erection of a levee or embankment which stopped the natural flow of surface or rain water over the lands of the parties. The complaint, after describing the lands of the parties to the record, continues : Said plaintiff further says that over the said lands of the plaintiff and defendant, and for several miles to the north and south thereof, there is, and has been time whereof the memory of man runneth not to the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Taylor v. FickasIndiana Supreme Court · 1878
  2. Cairo & Vincennes R. R. v. StevensIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  3. Schlichter v. PhillipyIndiana Supreme Court · 1879
  4. Butler v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1855
  5. Depew v. Board of TrusteesIndiana Supreme Court · 1854

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Cairo, V. & C. Ry. Co. v. BrevoortU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Indiana · 1894
  2. Shelbyville & Brandywine Turnpike Co. v. GreenIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  3. Hebron Gravel Road Co. v. HarveyIndiana Supreme Court · 1883
  4. Evansville, Mount Carmel & Northern Railway Co. v. ScottIndiana Court of Appeals · 1916
  5. Franklin v. DurgeeSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1901

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API