Pease v. Bridge
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Bill in equity to compel a reconvej-ance of real estate and to remove a cloud from a title; brought to the Superior Court in Hartford County. Facts found by a committee and bill dismissed by Beardsley, J. Motion in error by the petitioner. The case is sufficiently stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtPardee, J.
This is a bill in equity. The petitioner alleges, in substance, that in 1878 William Weirs, Charles E. Gager and Leonard A. Bradley obtained from him by fraud the title to and possession of certain real estate, and conveyed the same to the respondent, who had full knowledge of the fraud. He asks for a decree, compelling a reconveyance to himself. The facts having been found by a committee, the Superior Court dismissed his bill. He filed a motion in error, alleging as errors the decision of the court that the respondent had neither actual nor constructive notice of the fraud, that the fact…
2Cited by5 opinions
- Dietrich v. HutchinsonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1901
- Roberts v. McIntireSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1892
- Lynch v. MoserSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1900
- Peter v. ByrneSupreme Court of Missouri · 1903
- Driskill v. AshleySupreme Court of Missouri · 1914