Legal Opinion

State v. Nuttall

Utah Supreme Court

Decided December 28, 1964No. 10189PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

HENRIOD, Chief Justice:

Appeal from a conviction for obtaining a chose in action from one Gittens under false pretenses. 1 Reversed.

Nuttall induced Gittens to join in the following scheme: Nuttall was to sell a tractor to Gittens under a paper transaction, without any transfer of possession. Then Gittens, under another paper transaction, was to lease the tractor back to Nuttall, who was to re-lease it to others for a profit to be divided between the two. Gittens was not to put up any money but was to get either the tractor or $300 for nothing under the five-year contract. There was no tractor…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State v. VatsisUtah Supreme Court · 1960

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. WaltonUtah Supreme Court · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API