Legal Opinion
Conyers v. City of Chicago
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided February 10, 2016No. 12 C 06144PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
John J. Tharp, Jr., United States District Judge
Plaintiffs Blake Conyers, Lamar Ewing, and Kevin Flint, individually and on behalf of a class, bring claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against the City of Chicago (the “City”). The plaintiffs allege that the City’s policies pertaining to the destruction of personal property items seized from arres-tees at the City’s police station violate the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments. The City has moved to dismiss the plaintiffs’ Fourth Amended Complaint pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6). Def.’s Mot. to Dismiss Fourth Am. Compl., ECF No.…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Williamson County Regional Planning Commission v. Hamilton Bank of Johnson CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Pennzoil Co. v. Texaco Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Rodriguez v. Plymouth Ambulance ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009
- Yee v. City of EscondidoSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- F. v. MartinDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2022
- Singer v. City of ChicagoDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2020
- Vazquez-Velazquez v. Puerto Rico Highway and Transportation AuthorityDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2021