Legal Opinion

United States v. Velez Carrero

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided February 27, 1996No. 95-1351PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CYR, Circuit Judge.

Defendant-appellant Moisés Velez Carrero (“Velez”) appeals his sentence on the ground that the government breached its plea agreement (“the Agreement”) by failing to recommend that there be no adjustment pursuant to § 3B1.1 of the United States Sentencing Guidelines. We agree.

“Because plea bargaining requires defendants to waive fundamental constitutional rights, we hold prosecutors engaging in plea bargaining to ‘the most meticulous standards of both promise and performance.’ ” United States v. Clark, 55 F.3d 9, 12 (1st Cir.1995) (citation omitted). In the Agreement, the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Santobello v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. United States v. Barney Canada, A/K/A Byron Levon CanadaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1992
  3. United States v. ClarkCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1995

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. United States v. FrazierCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2003
  2. United States v. Sanchez BarretoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1996
  3. United States v. Richard LawlorCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
  4. United States v. Rivera-RodriguezCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2007
  5. United States v. Bernard F. BradstreetCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2000

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API