Legal Opinion
Candado Stevedoring Corp. v. Lowe
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided August 3, 1936No. 409PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
AUGUSTUS N. HAND, Circuit Judge.
Pietro Angelo, hereinafter called the “claimant,” was injured while employed as a stevedore on the barge Loretta by Can-dado Stevedoring Corporation, hereinafter called the “employer.” He filed a claim for compensation, pursuant to the provisions of the Longshoremen’s and Harbor Workers’ Compensation Act (33 U.S.C.A. § 901 et seq.), was awarded compensation thereunder, and, in addition, the 20 per cent, penalty provided by section 14 (f) of the act (33 U.S.C.A. § 914 (f). The employer was a self-insurer.
At the time the claimant was injured the Loretta was owned…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Twine v. LockeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1934
- American Lumbermen's Mut. Casualty Co. v. LoweCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1934
- Matter of Hart v. PerkinsNew York Court of Appeals · 1932
3Cited by7 opinions
- South Chicago Coal & Dock Co. v. BassettCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1939
- Arrow Stevedore Co. v. PillsburyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1937
- Weyerhaeuser Timber Co. v. MarshallCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1939
- Koernschild v. W.H. Streit, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1993
- Grain Handling Co. v. McManigalDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1940
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.