Legal Opinion
Greenwood v. Bailes
Supreme Court of Alabama
Decided May 16, 1935No. 6 Div. 723PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GARDNER, Justice.
The hill seeks ■ abatement- of a liquor nuisance, and upon its presentation to the chancellor an order for a temporary writ of injunction was entered. Greenwood v. State, 229 Ala. 6S0, 159 So. 91. Motion to dissolve and discharge this temporary writ was denied, and defendants appeal.
The bill contains all essential averments embraced in the statute for abatement of a liquor nuisance, and its equity is not challenged. Section 4671, Code 1923. The verification is by the solicitor for the Tenth judicial circuit, and is pursuant to section 4672, Code 1923.
It is earnestly argued…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Webb v. City of DemopolisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1891
- State ex rel. Lott v. BrewerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1879
- Forney v. Calhoun CountySupreme Court of Alabama · 1887
- Fulton v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1911
- Worthen v. State ex rel. VernerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1914
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Cosby v. MooreSupreme Court of Alabama · 1953
- King v. CampbellSupreme Court of Alabama · 2007
- West v. State Ex Rel. MatthewsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1937
- Barnett v. State Ex Rel. SimpsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1938
- Cochran v. State Ex Rel. GallionSupreme Court of Alabama · 1960
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.