Nucor Corp. v. Kilman
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1DissentRay Thornton, Justice
Because I believe stice, judgment was void ab initio from a failure of appellees to strictly comply with the requirements for a summons, and because I believe that System’s unconditional right to intervene warrants setting aside the default judgment so that it can protect its interest under the indemnification clause with Nucor, I respectfully dissent.
Rule 4(b) of the Arkansas Rules of Civil Procedure provides:
Form. The summons shall be styled in the name of the court and shall be dated and signed by the clerk; be under the seal of the court; contain the names of the parties; be directed to…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Smith v. Sidney Moncrief Pontiac, Buick, GMC Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2003
- Tucker v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1982
- Wilburn v. Keenan Companies, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1989
- Carruth v. Design Interiors, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1996
- Raymond v. RaymondSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2001
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.