Legal Opinion

Borowinski v. Board of Review

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided December 21, 2001PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

787 A.2d 902 (2001)

346 N.J. Super. 242

William J. BOROWINSKI, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

BOARD OF REVIEW and Spevack & Cannan, Defendants-Respondents.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued November 28, 2001.

Decided December 21, 2001.

William J. Borowinski, South River, appellant, argued the cause pro se.

Alan C. Stephens, Trenton, argued the cause for respondent, Board of Review (John J. Farmer, Jr., Attorney General of New Jersey, attorney; Michael J. Haas, Assistant Attorney General, of counsel; Mr. Stephens, Deputy Attorney General, on the brief).

Before Judges BAIME, NEWMAN[1] and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Brady v. Board of ReviewSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1997
  2. Beaunit Mills, Inc. v. Division of Employment SecurityNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1956
  3. State v. PadillaNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1999
  4. In re GoldmanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2002

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In re N.J.A.C.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2017
  2. Silver v. Board of ReviewNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2013
  3. In ReNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2017
  4. In ReNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2017
  5. WESTLY R. MANDOSKE VS. BOARD OF REVIEW (DEPARTMENT OF LABOR)New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API