Borowinski v. Board of Review
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
1Opinion of the Court
787 A.2d 902 (2001)
346 N.J. Super. 242
William J. BOROWINSKI, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
BOARD OF REVIEW and Spevack & Cannan, Defendants-Respondents.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued November 28, 2001.
Decided December 21, 2001.
William J. Borowinski, South River, appellant, argued the cause pro se.
Alan C. Stephens, Trenton, argued the cause for respondent, Board of Review (John J. Farmer, Jr., Attorney General of New Jersey, attorney; Michael J. Haas, Assistant Attorney General, of counsel; Mr. Stephens, Deputy Attorney General, on the brief).
Before Judges BAIME, NEWMAN[1] and…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Brady v. Board of ReviewSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1997
- Beaunit Mills, Inc. v. Division of Employment SecurityNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1956
- State v. PadillaNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1999
- In re GoldmanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2002
3Cited by5 opinions
- In re N.J.A.C.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2017
- Silver v. Board of ReviewNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2013
- In ReNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2017
- In ReNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2017
- WESTLY R. MANDOSKE VS. BOARD OF REVIEW (DEPARTMENT OF LABOR)New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2019