Legal Opinion
Theobald v. Satterthwaite
Washington Supreme Court
Decided March 11, 1948No. 30355PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Mallery, C. J. —
From a judgment in favor of the plaintiffs, the defendants appeal.
Appellants Satterthwaite run a barbershop and beauty-shop in the city of Tacoma under the name of the Crystal Palace Barber and Beauty Shop. It consists of a suite of three rooms, the back room being the barbershop, the middle room being the operating room of the beauty shop, and the room facing the outside being a reception room.
No attendant was kept in the reception room, and the interior of it was visible to outsiders through a glass door. Outsiders could not see into the operating room, nor could persons in…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Bunnell v. . SternNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
3Cited by10 opinions
- Judkins v. Sadler-MacNeilWashington Supreme Court · 1962
- Collins v. Boeing Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1971
- Schleisner Co. v. BirchettCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1953
- Eifler v. Shurgard Capital Management Corp.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1993
- Sisters of Charity of the Incarnate Word, Houston v. Meaux, Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)2003
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.