Boltinghouse v. Abbott Laboratories, Inc.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
REBECCA R. PALLMEYER, United States District Judge
Plaintiffs Gary Boltinghouse, Jr., Robert Taylor, and Mark Canales worked as “field service specialists” for Defendant Abbott Laboratories, Inc. (“Abbott”). Plaintiffs allege that Abbott violated the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”), 29 U.S.C. § 201 et seq., by failing to pay them, and other similarly situated employees, for overtime work. Plaintiffs now move for conditional class certification and court-authorized notice under the FLSA. As explained here, the court grants the motion for conditional certification…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Hoffmann-La Roche Inc. v. SperlingSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Longcrier v. HL-A CO., INC.District Court, S.D. Alabama · 2009
- Jirak v. Abbott Laboratories, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2008
- White v. MPW Industrial Services, Inc.District Court, E.D. Tennessee · 2006
- Salomon v. Adderley Industries, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2012
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Slaughter v. Caidan Mgmt. Co.District Court, E.D. Illinois · 2018
- Hudson v. Protech Security Group, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2017
- Agha v. Uber Technologies lncDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2024
- Campbell v. Marshall International, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2022
- Campbell v. Marshall International, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2022
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.