Legal Opinion

Ackiss v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided May 4, 1896No. 18678PublishedCited by 2 opinions

On the Proofs. The Reporters statement of the case: The following are the facts in this case as found by the court: I. Plaintiff, Harrison S. Ackiss, was clerk of the district court of the United States for the eastern district of Virginia, Norfolk division, from the 1st day of April, 1892, to September SO, 1894. II.

Read the full summary

On the Proofs. The Reporters statement of the case: The following are the facts in this case as found by the court: I. Plaintiff, Harrison S. Ackiss, was clerk of the district court of the United States for the eastern district of Virginia, Norfolk division, from the 1st day of April, 1892, to September SO, 1894. II. During said period he was in attendance at the office of the clerk of said court at Norfolk, Va., 256 days when no judge of Said court was present, upon each of which days the said clerk entered upon the journal of the court the following entry: “Court opened pursuant to section…

1Opinion of the CourtDavis, J.

It is contended by plaintiff, who, during the period in controversy, was clerk of the district court of the United States for the eastern district of Virginia, that he is entitled to certain fees disallowed by the accounting officers. Among these are fees for attendance at the clerk’s office in Norfolk, Va., during 256 days when nojudge was present. Upon each of those days the clerk made upon the journal the following entry: “Court opened pursuant to section 574, R. S., U. S. Present, H. S. Ackiss, clerk. Office business transacted. * * * Adjourned * * * [usually the following day].”

The…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. United States v. PitmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  2. Jones v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1885
  3. United States v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  4. McMullen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  5. Converse v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1890

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Butler v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Indiana · 1898
  2. Dart v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1897

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API