Indiana & Michigan Municipal Distributors Ass'n v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the court filed by Senior Circuit Judge THORNBERRY.
THORNBERRY, Senior Circuit Judge:
On May 28, 1976, the Indiana and Michigan Electric Company (I&M) submitted increased rate schedules to the Commission 1 pursuant to section 205(d) of the Federal Power Act, 16 U.S.C. § 824d(d). In particular, and of sole relevance to this appeal, I&M sought to increase its rate schedule governing sales to municipal wholesale customers.2 The Commission, after briefly suspending the increase, permitted it to take effect, subject to refund,3 on July 23, 1976.4 The administrative law judge then took…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Maine Public Service Company v. Federal Power CommissionCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1978
- Mississippi River Fuel Corporation v. Federal Power Commission, United Gas Pipe Line Company, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1957
- Indiana Municipal Electric Association v. Federal Energy Regulation Commission, Public Service Company of Indiana, Inc., IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1980
- American Public Power Association v. Federal Power Commission, Boston Edison Company, Intervenor. Cities of Anaheim, Alameda, Lodi v. Federal Power Commission, Boston Edison Company, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1975
3Cited by1 opinion
- Indiana and Michigan Municipal Distributors Association v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Indiana & Michigan Electric Co., Intervenor. City of Anderson, Indiana and City of Auburn, Indiana v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Indiana & Michigan Electric Co., Indiana & Michigan Municipal Distributors Ass'n, IntervenorsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1981