Superior Oil Co. v. Vanderhoof
District Court, D. Montana
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER AND OPINION
JAMESON, District Judge.
Plaintiff, lessee in an oil and gas lease, instituted this action pursuant to the Federal Interpleader Act.1 The defendants have or claim landowners’ royalty interests in the oil and gas produced from the land under lease. Plaintiff’s motion for interpleader was granted in an order entered October 11, 1968.2 Thereafter the defendant Bright & Schiff moved for summary judgment against the defendants Edward and Orval Vanderhoof. This motion was denied by order and opinion filed November 20, 1968.3
The Vanderhoofs are record owners of 1040 acres of land in…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'n v. PendergrassCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
- Lee v. Stockmen's National BankMontana Supreme Court · 1922
- Goodson & Koski v. SmithWyoming Supreme Court · 1952
- Continental Oil Co. v. BellMontana Supreme Court · 1933
- West River Equipment Co. v. Holzworth Construction Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1959
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Sherrodd, Inc. v. Morrison-Knudsen Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1991
- Clough v. JacksonMontana Supreme Court · 1971
- Sherrodd Inc. v. Morrison-KnudsenMontana Supreme Court · 1991
- Sherrodd, Inc. v. Morrison-Knudsen Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1991