Legal Opinion

Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. Butler

Texas Supreme Court

Decided April 1, 1936No. Application No. 21,862PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. Judge TAYLOR

of the Commission of Appeals delivered the opinion for the court.

The disposition made of this case by the Court of Civil Appeals (89 S. W. (2d) 791) is correct. We are not in accord, however, with the statement in the opinion to the effect that in Missouri K. & T. Ry Co. v. Belcher, 89 Texas, 428, 35 S. W., 6, the rule, that in order to recover special damages for breach of contract it is incumbent upon plaintiff to show that at the date of the contract the defendant had notice of the special conditions rendering such damages the natural and probable result of the breach, was…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co. v. BelcherTexas Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Conn v. Texas & N. O. Ry. Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1929
  3. Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. ButlerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1936

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. English v. FischerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1982
  2. Harvey v. Crockett Drilling Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1951
  3. Martin v. DarcyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API