Legal Opinion

Drake v. Rowe

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided February 10, 1915PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from Muhlenberg Crircuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

Chief Justice Mtller

Reversing.

The appellants, Drake and Morton, brought this action in equity on December 23rd, 1912, against the appellee, T. H. Rowe, to recover from Rowe the sum of $1,086.06, which represented the unpaid portion of four notes, executed by Rowe, as principal* to the H. Herr-mann Manufacturing Company, of Evansville, Indiana, hereinafter called the manufacturing company for brevity, with Drake and Morton as.sureties thereon.

Upon the trial, the chancellor dismissed the petition with costs, and the plaintiffs appeal.

The four notes sued on were as…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Aultman & Taylor Co. v. MeadeCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1905
  2. Louisville Banking Co. v. BuchananCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1904

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Midwest Mutual Insurance Co. v. WiremanCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2001
  2. Dalton v. HowellCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1918
  3. Frankenberger v. CimbaUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API