Legal Opinion

Appelt v. Timpone

New York Supreme Court

Decided March 17, 1949PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtF. E. Johnson, J.

Defendant, in one notice of motion, seeks to set aside, etc., and obtain a new trial on four grounds; the first and second together relate to a claim of newly discovered evidence, including the alleged misconduct of a juror not known of until after the verdict was rendered; they will be discussed first:(1) There is no ground for deciding, as charged, that the juror “ was biased and incompetent to act as a juror,” or for finding that he then knew the plaintiff and the plaintiff’s wife, or that there was any “ concealment of his knowledge and acquaintance with ” them. No unbiased view of the…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Barrett v. . the Third Avenue R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1871
  2. Clark v. . WestNew York Court of Appeals · 1908
  3. Collins v. Central Trust Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1929
  4. Cowenhoven v. . BallNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
  5. Russell v. . RandallNew York Court of Appeals · 1890

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. People v. PaczovskiNew York Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Appelt v. TimponeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1949
  3. O 'Connor-Sullivan, Inc. v. Otto, New York County Courts1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API