Legal Opinion

Trentacost v. Brussel

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided March 12, 1980Published

1Opinion of the Court

82 N.J. 214 (1980)

412 A.2d 436

FLORENCE TRENTACOST, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,

v.

DR. NATHAN T. BRUSSEL, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Argued September 25, 1979.

Decided March 12, 1980.

Herbert C. Klein argued the cause for appellant (Klein, Chester, Greenburg & Henkoff, attorneys; Isaac Henkoff on the brief).

Gregory J. Aprile argued the cause for respondent (Philip M. Saginario, attorney).

The opinion of the Court was delivered by PASHMAN, J.

Once again this Court is asked to examine the contours of the relationship between residential landlords and their tenants.[1] Specifically,…

Also in this document: Concurrence; Dissent; Concurring in part, dissenting in part.

2Cases cited49 opinions

  1. Rowland v. ChristianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Rappaport v. NicholsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1959
  3. Goldberg v. Housing Auth. of City of NewarkSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1962
  4. Busik v. LevineSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1973
  5. Green v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API