McDonald v. City of Duluth
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Separate appeals by defendant from orders of the district court for St. Louis county, Ensign, J., respectively denying a motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or for a new trial, in each of two cases-between the same parties.
1Opinion of the CourtStart, C. J.
The plaintiff brought two actions against the city of Duluth, one to recover damages for personal injuries sustained by his infant daughter, by reason of the city’s alleged negligence in failing safely to construct and maintain a railing to a bridge over a stream which crosses one of its alleys; the other to recover in his own right for expenses incurred for medical treatment and nursing necessitated by his daughter’s injuries. Both cases were tried together. There was a verdict in the first one for the plaintiff for the sum of $550, and in the other for the sum, as reduced by the trial…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Anderson v. FieldingSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1904
- Blyhl v. Village of WatervilleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1894
- Conlon v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1897
3Cited by9 opinions
- Giaconi v. City of AstoriaOregon Supreme Court · 1911
- Thomson v. BolesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1941
- Larson v. Township of New Haven, Olmsted CountySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1969
- Paul v. FaricySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1949
- Swain v. City of NashvilleTennessee Supreme Court · 1936
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.