Legal Opinion

Flammer v. Cullen

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 29, 1917No. Docket No. 116PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from Wayne; Codd, J. Bill by Frank Flammer and another against James Cullen, special administrator of the estate of George Flammer, deceased, and Samuel J. Hunter and Frank Flammer, executors of the will of Kresenz Flammer, deceased, for specific performance of a land contract, for an accounting and other relief. From a decree for complainants, defendants Hunter and Flammer appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtBird, J.

Plaintiffs show by their bill that on September 23, 1911, George Flammer and his wife, Kresenz Flammer, sold to them on land contract a parcel of land situate in the city of Detroit, and described as lots 2, 3, and 4 of the subdivision of lot 4 of Edwin Jerome’s survey, etc., for the sum of $3,500. $1,000 was paid when the contract was executed, and $700 subsequently thereto; that the balance, amounting to $1,800 and accrued interest, is now due, and they are ^desirous of paying the same and getting a conveyance thereof; that in March, 1913, Kresenz Flammer died, and defendants, Hunter and…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Yalomstein v. YalomsteinMichigan Supreme Court · 1916

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Gustin v. McKayMichigan Supreme Court · 1917

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API