Legal Opinion

State v. Sailo

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided February 14, 1996No. 2-95-130-CRPublishedCited by 173 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DAY, Justice.

Appellee was charged by information with driving while intoxicated. In a pretrial motion to suppress, appellee argued that the evidence supporting the DWI charge was discovered during an improper investigative stop by the arresting officer. After conducting a hearing on the motion, the trial court suppressed the evidence, and the State appealed. Because the trial court erred in applying the law to these particular facts, we grant the State the relief it requests and reverse the order.

PROCEEDINGS BELOW

The Facts

Officers Richard Andrews and Christopher Alt of the Euless…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. United States v. MendenhallSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Alabama v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  5. Romero v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1990

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by173 opinions

  1. Martinez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2011
  2. Brother v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2005
  3. Joseph v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)1999
  4. Floyd v. City of Crystal SpringsMississippi Supreme Court · 1999
  5. State v. Tarvin, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)1998

168 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API