Ortega v. State

OPINION

FENDER, Chief Justice.

Appellant, Danny Negrete Ortega, was convicted by a jury of burglary of a habitation. Punishment was assessed at thirty-five years.

We affirm.

Ortega raises ten grounds of error in this appeal. They are as follows:(1) The Court erred in denying Appellant’s motion to suppress the tainted in-eourt identification.(2) The Court erred in denying Appellant’s motion to suppress the imper-missibly suggestive pre-trial identification.(3) The pre-trial identification procedure viewed from the totality of the circumstances, was so unnecessarily suggestive and conducive to…