Legal Opinion

Ruggles v. Board of Trustees

California Supreme Court

Decided March 24, 1891No. 14396PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Application to the Supreme Court for a writ of mandamus. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtBeatty, C. J.

Mandamus to compel the respondents to call and provide for the holding of an election of city officers.

Prior to May 6, 1890, the city of Woodland, in Yolo County, was a municipal corporation under a special charter. On that date a proposition to reorganize as a city of the fifth class, under the general incorporation act, approved March 13,1883, was duly submitted to the electors of said city, and approved by a majority vote.

Thereafter, on June 16,1890, at a special election held in obedience to the provisions of section 4 of said act, the respondents and other city officers enumerated in…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Linforth v. S.F. Gas and Electric Co.California Supreme Court · 1909
  2. People v. Town of BerkeleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API