Cecil v. Southern Express Co.

*253Opinion of the Court by

Judge Quin

Affirming.

This is an action for damages growing out of the alleged failure of appellee to furnish a car for a shipment of livestock.

Appellant’s stock, consisting of eleven head, was catalogued and advertised for sale at Cambridge, Ind., March 10, 1915. So that the stock might reach the latter point on March 6, application was made to appellee’s agent for a oar to be placed on the switch at Danville, Ky., March 5. It is alleged the car was not placed until March 7; the horses arrived at Cambridge on the 8th, too late to get them in proper condition for the…