Legal Opinion

Weed v. Central of Georgia Ry. Co.

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided January 23, 1900No. 877PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Southern District of Georgia.

1Opinion of the Court

BO ARM AN, District Judge.

The appellants claim $15,000 as an allowance for solicitors’ fees due to them, as they contend, for services rendered in the prosecution of the intervention of their client John S. Tilney, in a suit pending in the circuit court of the United States for the Southern district of Georgia, which involved the properties of the Central Railroad & Banking Company of Georgia. They seek to have the allowance claimed paid out of the fund arising from litigation in said suit, and the settlement thereof, a part of which fund is yet in the registry of the court awaiting further…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Central Railroad & Banking Co. of Ga. v. PettusSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  2. Findlay v. McAllisterSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  3. Ober & Sons Co. v. Macon Construction Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1897

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Nolte v. Hudson Nav. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1931
  2. In Re New York InvestorsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1935
  3. In Re Allied Owners CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1935
  4. General Finance Corporation v. New York State Rys.District Court, W.D. New York · 1933
  5. Mitchell v. WhitmanCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1938

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API