Legal Opinion
Sarceno Reyes v. Kimuell
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided September 1, 2017No. Civil Action No. 2016-0852PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Granting Plaintiff’s Motion for Entry of Default Judgment
RUDOLPH CONTRERAS, United States District Judge
I. INTRODUCTION
Ms. Ana Maria Sarceno Reyes sued Mr. Kimmoti Kimuell, doing business as Burrito Brothers, alleging that he failed to pay her statutorily required overtime wages. After Mr. Kimuell failed to appear, file an answer, or otherwise respond to the complaint, the Clerk’s office entered a default against him. Ms. Sarceno Reyes now moves for a default judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 55(b)(2) in the amount of $117,031.24 in damages, $3647 in…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Blum v. StensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Anderson v. Mt. Clemens Pottery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Michele E. Shepherd and Larue Graves v. American Broadcasting Companies, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1995
- Adkins v. TeseoDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2001
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Bricklayers & Trowel Trades Int'l Pension Fund v. Kel-Tech Constr., Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- Borum v. Brentwood Village, LLCDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2020
- Colombini v. MeinkDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2026
- Guarantee Company of North America USA v. Lakota Contracting Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2023
- Hits Before Fame, LLC v. HernandezDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2025
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.