Legal Opinion · Concurrence

United States v. Heyman Co.

United States Customs Court

Decided June 10, 1963No. A.R.D. 157; Entry Nos. 726378; 745184; 752531Published

1Concurrence

CONCtJRRrNG OPINION

Donlon, Judge:

For the reasons stated in my concurring opinion in United States v. The Heyman Co., Inc., 43 Cust. Ct. 619, A.R.D. 113, in which the same parties litigated the same issue as that now before us, I concur in the result reached by Judge Kichardson. I concur, also, that the newly adduced evidence is consistent with the evidence in the incorporated record, with respect to the restricted dealer policy of Cordeleria Santa Ines, in exporting similar merchandise to the United States.

However, I do not agree with the entire finding of fact number 4. I do not find that…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. United States v. Heyman Co.United States Customs Court · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API