Darby v. Sentry Insurance Automobile Mutual Co.
Louisiana Court of Appeal
1Per curiam
IsThe defendants, Sentry Insurance Automobile Mutual Company, Bruce J. Amond and Lakeshore Chrysler, Dodge, Jeep, Inc. (“Lakeshore”), seek review of the trial court’s judgment denying Lake-shore’s motion in limine to exclude evidence of Lakeshore’s financial condition and the trial court’s conclusion that under theories of vicarious liability, civil conspiracy and negligent entrustment, Lakeshore could be found liable for exemplary damages.
This litigation arises out of a September 30, 2001 collision involving vehicles operated by the plaintiff, Karen Darby, and Bruce Amond. At the time of the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Ross v. Conoco, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 2002
- Pepper v. TripletSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2004
- Hughes v. GoodreauLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2002
- GIBBS CONST. CO. v. State, Dept. of LaborSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1989
- Lacoste v. CrochetLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2000
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Darby v. SENTRY INS. AUTO. MUT. CO.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2007