Legal Opinion
Sandy MacGregor Co. v. Vaco Grip Co.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided December 11, 1924No. 4109PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DENISON, Circuit Judge.
Infringement suit on patents, 1,439,338 and 1,439,339, both issued to Harry W. Smith on December 19, 1922, for a “golf practicing and exercising device.” Application for 1,439,338 was filed December 17, 1920, and for the other one on June 1, 1921. Of the claims sued upon, the District Court held some invalid and other valid and infringed, and directed the usual injunction. The defendant appeals; the plaintiff does not.
In the immediate field of golf practicing devices there were several instances of a box set down so that its surface was flush with the ground, and…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Miller v. Eagle Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Underwood v. GerberSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Doig v. Morgan Mach. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1903
- Benjamin Electric Mfg. Co. v. Dale Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1907
- Higgin Mfg. Co. v. WatsonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1920
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Ric-Wil Co. v. E. B. Kaiser Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1950
- Reo Motor Car Co. v. Gear Grinding MacH. Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1930
- In re OrnumCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1982
- Seymour v. Ford Motor Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1930
- Callison v. DeanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1934
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.