Legal Opinion

Aramnahad v. Blinken

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided December 22, 2025No. Civil Action No. 2024-1817Published

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA MOHAMMAD ARAMNAHAD, et al., Plaintiffs, v. No. 24-cv-1817-MAU MARCO RUBIO, Secretary of State, et al., 1 Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiffs Mohammad Aramnahad and his wife Meili Li (collectively “Plaintiffs”) seek declaratory, injunctive, and mandamus relief to compel the United States Government (“Defendants” or “the Government”) to adjudicate their immigrant visa application. ECF No. 1.2 Plaintiffs contend that the Government has unreasonably delayed and unlawfully withheld adjudication of their visa application in violation…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  3. Scott v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Environmental Services (TOC), Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
  5. Honig v. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1988

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API