Legal Opinion

Baker v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided April 6, 1967No. 4236PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CAYTON, Associate Judge.

Appellant Baker was convicted of violating the “Narcotics Vagrancy Statute,” D.C. Code 1961, § 33-416a. He asserts many errors including insufficiency of the evidence and the unconstitutionality of the statute. The constitutional questions have been considered and decided in two companion cases which were consolidated with this one. Ricks v. United States, D.C.App., 228 A.2d 316, decided this day.

In this case we do not reach the constitutional questions because we are of the opinion that the evidence does not support the conviction. Baker was tried and convicted along…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Ricks v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1967

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hattie Mae Ricks and Joseph N. Williams v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1968
  2. Johnson v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API